Field Notes · Facilitation

How Competing Agendas Become Shared Vision

By Ron Brumbarger · Indianapolis

Alignment is not everyone agreeing. It is a room full of different interests that finally understands itself well enough to move together.

Picture the room on the first morning. Roughly twenty-five people from different organizations, different budgets, different priorities, and a real history of not getting along. A crisis in Manitou Springs, Colorado had brought them together, and earlier attempts to align had already failed. People were skeptical, a couple were openly annoyed, and one walked out inside the first hour. By the evening of day two, former adversaries were joking together and building on each other's plans. Nothing about the seating was arranged. So what changed?

Why alignment had failed before

No shared vocabulary, so every conversation talked past itself. No shared method, so meetings devolved into position-defending. And a habit of blame, where each group arrived certain the others were the problem. Under those conditions, more meetings only deepen the ruts.

What actually moved the room

A target on the wall, not personalities across the table. A co-design canvas abstracted the crisis into something the whole room could face together, which pulled the heat off individuals and their agendas.

A shared method and vocabulary. Once everyone spoke the same problem-solving language, disagreement had somewhere useful to go. Language became a bridge instead of a wall.

Mixed, competitive teams. Deliberately splitting the silos into cross-cut teams turned "my organization's agenda" into "our team's best idea" for two days.

Improv, analogous thinking, and a trading-card break. The lighter activities were not filler. "Yes, and" builds the reflex to add instead of negate, and a few shared laughs quietly dissolved friction that no negotiation would have touched.

They did not leave agreeing on everything. They left understanding where the disagreement actually lived, which is what makes it workable.

What shifted was culture, not just a decision

The measurable output was a plan, and a good one. The durable output was a change in how the group treated one another. Respect for each other's constraints. A shared way to work through the next hard thing. Months later, participants had carried the skills into their own organizations and put them to use on new projects. The alignment outlasted the room.

When this approach fits

Complex public problems where no single party can solve it alone. Multi-stakeholder corporate initiatives, launches, mergers, reorganizations, where competing interests have stalled progress. And any situation where previous alignment efforts failed precisely because the method was missing.

Have stakeholders who need to become a team?

Let's talk about the room you need to align and how to design for it.

Book a call →